Nissan Interstar MOT Results
Registered in 200947.1% pass rate
from 172 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Interstar is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Brakes
(84% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
23% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 23% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
9.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
9.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
9.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
23% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.2% fail on Cable
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 3.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.58% fail on Lever
-
0.58% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.58% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.58% fail on Switch
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.2% fail on Switch (102 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Position lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Horn
- 0.58% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.58% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 6.4% fail on Ball joint
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.7% fail on
Springs
-
1.7% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.58% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.58% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.58% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
1.7% fail on
Leaf springs
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
9.3% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.2% fail on Joints
-
8.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.58% fail on Bumpers
-
0.58% fail on
Body
- 0.58% fail on Other body component
-
0.58% fail on
Doors
-
0.58% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.58% fail on Door condition
-
0.58% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
9.3% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
9.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.7% fail on Washers
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
-
1.2% fail on
View to rear
- 1.2% fail on Mirrors
-
0.58% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
-
7.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.2% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
0.58% fail on
Power steering
- 0.58% fail on Operation
-
5.2% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(140% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.3% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.58% fail on Size/type
-
1.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(83% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(82% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.58% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.58% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(82% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.58% fail on Speedometer
-
0.58% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.58% fail on Attachment