Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Interstar MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.5% pass rate
from 168 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Interstar is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (89% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Horn
    • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
    • 9.5% fail on Hub components (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.60% fail on Cable
    • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.60% fail on Components
        • 0.60% fail on Hoses
    • 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.60% fail on Shackle
        • 0.60% fail on Anchor
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 7.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering system
      • 0.60% fail on Steering box
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
        • 0.60% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 0.60% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.60% fail on Body condition