Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2001
46.4% pass rate
from 293 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (69% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.34% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.34% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.1% fail on Battery
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.68% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.68% fail on Lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 0.68% fail on Horn
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 30% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (90% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.34% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.34% fail on Brake operation
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 12% fail on Components
        • 11% fail on Pipes (84% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Valves (79% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Hoses
        • 0.34% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.4% fail on Restricted movement (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on ABS (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
        • 0.34% fail on Condition
        • 0.34% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.68% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
      • 0.34% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.34% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.2% fail on Spring mounting (85% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Component mounting
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Front (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Rear
    • 3.8% fail on Leaf springs (200% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Anchor
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.34% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.34% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.34% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.34% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 16% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (83% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Body condition (77% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (89% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 9.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Cap
      • 0.34% fail on Tank
      • 0.34% fail on Hose
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.34% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system
      • 3.4% fail on Other components (26 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Steering pivot point (29 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.34% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.34% fail on Steering control
      • 0.34% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.34% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
    • 0.34% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.68% fail on Towbars
    • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.34% fail on Towbar