Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.1% pass rate
from 358 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.4% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.84% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Pedal
    • 0.84% fail on Mechanical brake components (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.28% fail on Lever
        • 0.28% fail on Clevis joint
        • 0.28% fail on Pivot
    • 0.56% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.28% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.28% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.28% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.56% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.56% fail on Horn
      • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.84% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.9% fail on Chassis (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Chassis condition (97% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.56% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.84% fail on Mounting fixings (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Other body component
    • 0.84% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Carrier
      • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.56% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Tank
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.56% fail on Floor
    • 0.28% fail on Towbar
      • 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.28% fail on Cabs
      • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.84% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 0.84% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.84% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.28% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.56% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.56% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.56% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.28% fail on View to rear
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Intermediate drop arm (16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
        • 0.28% fail on Steering component
    • 0.84% fail on Power steering
      • 0.56% fail on Other components
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.56% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.56% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.28% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.28% fail on Steering play
      • 0.28% fail on Steering box
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.56% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Speedometer (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.28% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.28% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment