Nissan Navara MOT Results
Registered in 200251.7% pass rate
from 232 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
- 7.8% fail on Service brake performance (99% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.43% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
-
6.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.43% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.6% fail on
Service brake performance
- 8.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
5.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.86% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.86% fail on Brake pads
-
0.86% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.43% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.43% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.43% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.43% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.3% fail on
Chassis
(140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.2% fail on
Transmission
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.86% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.7% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Body
- 0.86% fail on Mounting fixings (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Other body component
-
1.3% fail on
Cabs
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.86% fail on
Seats
- 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Pipe
-
0.43% fail on
Towbar
- 0.43% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.43% fail on Floor
-
7.3% fail on
Chassis
(140% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
-
3.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.43% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.86% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.43% fail on Horn
-
0.43% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.43% fail on Position lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.86% fail on Suspension arm
- 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Other suspension component (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.86% fail on
Springs
- 0.86% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.86% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.9% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Washers
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.43% fail on Driver's view
-
0.43% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
-
0.43% fail on
View to rear
- 0.43% fail on Mirrors
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.86% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.43% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.43% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.43% fail on Other leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.43% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.43% fail on Drag link end
-
0.43% fail on
Other components
- 0.43% fail on Steering component
- 0.43% fail on Locking devices
-
0.86% fail on
Steering play
- 0.43% fail on Steering box
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.7% fail on Registration plates
-
0.43% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment