Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.9% pass rate
from 263 tests in 2020
(3.2% better than other 2002 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (13% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (15% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (0.073% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (7.0% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (12% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (12% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.38% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (58% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (30% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (2.0% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (0.064% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.38% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.38% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.38% fail on Other braking system component
  • 19% fail on Suspension (3.9% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms (25% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3.0% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (32% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Leaf springs (16% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Leaf spring (91% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (4.8% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Chassis (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis condition (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Prop shaft (0.43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Bumpers (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (8.5% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Body condition
      • 0.38% fail on Panel
      • 0.38% fail on Other body component
    • 0.76% fail on Fuel system (0.91% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Tank
      • 0.38% fail on Hose
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (15% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (29% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (29% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (28% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (45% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.76% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (17% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers (65% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3.4% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (4.4% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (21% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3.8% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks (6.2% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components (48% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Intermediate drop arm (18 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.38% fail on Other components
        • 0.38% fail on Steering component
    • 0.76% fail on Power steering (7.5% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Operation
      • 0.38% fail on Pump
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering box
    • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (31% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (8.1% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle (23% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates (22% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.38% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.38% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment