MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Navara » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2003
52.8% pass rate
from 1,122 tests in 2017
(9.3% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps (52% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual lamps (71% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.089% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.53% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.36% fail on Horn (84% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Brake operation (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.9% fail on Components
        • 9.1% fail on Pipes (44% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Hoses
        • 0.36% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.36% fail on Valves (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Leaks
      • 0.45% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.089% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.5% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Cable
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pivot (17 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.089% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.089% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 18% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.2% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints (80% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.3% fail on Front (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts (55% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (55% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.1% fail on Leaf springs (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Shackle (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Anchor
      • 0.089% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.089% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.089% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.089% fail on Securing bolts
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (86% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on General condition
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors (77% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.89% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on System
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.089% fail on Hose
    • 0.53% fail on Emissions (70% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 8.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.6% fail on Vehicle structure (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 0.53% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Steering (35% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Steering box (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
        • 0.36% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.27% fail on Intermediate drop arm (19 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Free play
        • 0.089% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.71% fail on Operation
      • 0.45% fail on Other components
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.089% fail on Drive system
    • 0.36% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.089% fail on Steering control
      • 0.089% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.089% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (52% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (47% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (51% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.98% fail on Road Wheels (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Condition
  • 0.27% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
    • 0.089% fail on Vehicle structure