Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.3% pass rate
from 2,967 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (20% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps (21% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (28 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.034% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.54% fail on Battery
    • 0.40% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.034% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms (52% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Rear
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Condition
      • 0.034% fail on Presence
    • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front drive shafts (38% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.7% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.17% fail on Shackle
        • 0.034% fail on Anchor
      • 0.10% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.034% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.067% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.034% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 10% fail on Steering (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Steering system (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Free play
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.067% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.034% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.91% fail on Steering control (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Steering coupling (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Flexible coupling (38 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.30% fail on Steering column (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering shaft (26 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.034% fail on Drive system
      • 0.034% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.034% fail on Pump
    • 0.034% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.034% fail on Locking devices
  • 10% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.6% fail on Components
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Valves (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
        • 0.034% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.27% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.034% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Front wheels (76% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Rear wheels (67% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.034% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.034% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components (26% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.067% fail on Brake drums (14 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.034% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.71% fail on ABS
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake control components (61% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal (61% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip (69% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.034% fail on Lever
      • 0.034% fail on Cable
  • 8.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (23% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen (54% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Mirrors (51% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.88% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.034% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Hose
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.61% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Doors (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.13% fail on Chassis
    • 0.067% fail on Load security
      • 0.067% fail on Bootlid (22 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Seats
      • 0.034% fail on Passengers
  • 0.91% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.61% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)