Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2009
53.0% pass rate
from 3,084 tests in 2020
(7.0% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps (31% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (44% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (40% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (40% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment (93% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.065% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors (68% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms (22% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover (93% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (44% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.5% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.065% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (76% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.032% fail on Axles
      • 0.032% fail on Axle
    • 0.032% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 13% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Other components
        • 0.032% fail on Steering component
        • 0.032% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.065% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.032% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.45% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.45% fail on Steering column (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Steering coupling (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Flexible coupling (28 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.032% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Steering shaft
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission (70% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Joints (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.097% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Bearing housing
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Belts (16 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
    • 0.97% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Pipe
      • 0.065% fail on System
    • 0.32% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
      • 0.065% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.032% fail on Panel
    • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.032% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel condition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Carrier
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.065% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.065% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.065% fail on Load security
      • 0.065% fail on Access panel (33 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Seats
      • 0.032% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.032% fail on Cabs
      • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Brakes (16% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.065% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (35% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.097% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.032% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (73% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Cable
        • 0.032% fail on Lever
        • 0.032% fail on Clevis joint
        • 0.032% fail on Pivot
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal
      • 0.032% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.032% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.032% fail on Leaks
    • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear
      • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.29% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition (34% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (33% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.065% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.65% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.097% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (72% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Seat belts (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Requirements
      • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.097% fail on Airbags (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (86% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates (86% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.032% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.032% fail on Anchorages