MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Navara » 2016

Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2016
79.7% pass rate
from 8,497 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.012% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.035% fail on Horn
    • 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors (57% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 4.5% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.012% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.012% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.012% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (94% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.082% fail on Rbt (sp) (95% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.012% fail on Rbt
          • 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.32% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (75% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Anti-lock braking system (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.047% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Pedal (92% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.024% fail on Parking brake control (93% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Lever (93% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.012% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.012% fail on Other components
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.92% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass (63% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on View to rear (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Mirrors (91% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.99% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Leaf springs (68% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.012% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.92% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.047% fail on Other suspension component (69% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.059% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (81% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.024% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.012% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.012% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.012% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.012% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.071% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.059% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.75% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Body (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Body condition
      • 0.012% fail on Panel
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.024% fail on Towbar
      • 0.024% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.012% fail on Chassis
      • 0.012% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.012% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.012% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.012% fail on Load security
      • 0.012% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.012% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.012% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.012% fail on Door condition
    • 0.012% fail on Seats
      • 0.012% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.012% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.012% fail on Cabs
      • 0.012% fail on Steps
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates (63% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.012% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts (36% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.15% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
      • 0.024% fail on Other components
    • 0.024% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.024% fail on Steering linkage components (97% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.012% fail on Steering play
      • 0.012% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment