MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » NV200 » 2010

Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.9% pass rate
from 1,206 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Position lamp (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.083% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.083% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Suspension (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.083% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.083% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.75% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.083% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.66% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.083% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.083% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.083% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.083% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.083% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.00% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.00% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Lever
        • 0.083% fail on Cable
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.58% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.41% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.083% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.083% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.083% fail on Servos
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.58% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.083% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.083% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Airbags
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.083% fail on Joints
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Other body component
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
      • 0.083% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.083% fail on Door condition
      • 0.083% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.083% fail on Hinge
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.083% fail on Tank
      • 0.083% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.083% fail on System
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.083% fail on Chassis
      • 0.083% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.083% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.083% fail on Carrier
    • 0.083% fail on Towbar
      • 0.083% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.083% fail on Seats
      • 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Steering (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering linkage components (96% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.083% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.083% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.083% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.083% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.083% fail on Belt(s)/padding