MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » NV200 » 2010

Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.9% pass rate
from 1,283 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Coil spring (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Leaf springs (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.078% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.078% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.078% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.47% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.078% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.078% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.078% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.078% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.55% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Rbt
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.078% fail on Linkage
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.078% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.55% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.078% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.078% fail on Valves
    • 0.078% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.078% fail on Lever
    • 0.078% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on View to rear
      • 0.94% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.078% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.078% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.23% fail on Spark ignition (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.078% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.078% fail on Joints
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Chassis
      • 0.23% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
      • 0.078% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Load security
      • 0.16% fail on Loading door (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Steering (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.078% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.078% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.078% fail on Attachment