Nissan NV200 MOT Results
Registered in 201058.6% pass rate
from 1,030 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(44% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 9.4% fail on Front lamps (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2010 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.97% fail on Horn
- 0.58% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.097% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.097% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.097% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.097% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.097% fail on
Flashing type
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.097% fail on Condition
- 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.19% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.097% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.097% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.097% fail on Shackle
-
0.097% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
0.097% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.097% fail on Condition
-
0.097% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Windscreen
- 0.097% fail on Bonnet
-
7.3% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Front wheels (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.097% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.097% fail on Brake operation
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.97% fail on
Components
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Hoses
- 0.097% fail on Cylinders
- 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.19% fail on Leaks
-
0.97% fail on
Components
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.39% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on ABS
-
0.097% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.097% fail on
Pedal
- 0.097% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.097% fail on
Pedal
- 0.097% fail on Restricted movement
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Valve stem
-
1.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.097% fail on Requirements
- 0.097% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.68% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(60% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Emissions
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on System
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.097% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.68% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate
-
0.49% fail on
Steering
(87% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.097% fail on Track rod end
-
0.49% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Body condition
-
0.097% fail on
Doors
- 0.097% fail on Drivers
-
0.097% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.097% fail on Condition