MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » NV200 » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.6% pass rate
from 1,030 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Front lamps (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.97% fail on Horn
    • 0.58% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.097% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.097% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.097% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.097% fail on Side repeaters
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Front drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.097% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.097% fail on Shackle
    • 0.097% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.097% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Components (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Hoses
        • 0.097% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on ABS
    • 0.097% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.097% fail on Pedal
        • 0.097% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.097% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.097% fail on Requirements
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on System
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.097% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.68% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering system (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.29% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Body condition
    • 0.097% fail on Doors
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers
  • 0.097% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.097% fail on Condition