MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Bipper » 2017

Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2017
74.7% pass rate
from 1,436 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.42% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.28% fail on Battery(ies) (14 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.070% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility (39% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (62% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.42% fail on View to rear
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.070% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.070% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake linings and pads (71% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.42% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.28% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.070% fail on Valves
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Servos
  • 4.7% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.42% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.070% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.070% fail on Sound deadening material
    • 0.070% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.63% fail on Steering
    • 0.42% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.42% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.070% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.56% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.070% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.070% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.070% fail on Transmission
      • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.070% fail on Joints
    • 0.070% fail on Body
      • 0.070% fail on Other body component
    • 0.070% fail on Doors
      • 0.070% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
  • 0.21% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.070% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.070% fail on Condition