MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 1994
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1994
50.0% pass rate
from 76 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 5.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 3.9% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 9.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (38 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.6% fail on Outline marker lamps (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Outline marker lamp (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.9% fail on Rbt
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.6% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Cable
        • 1.3% fail on Pivot
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 11% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 11% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs
      • 1.3% fail on Steps
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 1.3% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition