Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Peugeot Boxer MOT Results
Registered in 199655.2% pass rate
from 774 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(24% better than other 1996 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Horn
- 3.6% fail on Battery
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Tell tales
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.5% fail on
Position lamps
(40% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Front lamps (47% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (55% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Fog lamp (60% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Tell tale
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(47% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (45% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.0% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.52% fail on Lamp
- 0.39% fail on Switch
- 0.26% fail on Tell tale
- 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.5% fail on
Components
- 6.6% fail on Pipes (61% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Hoses
- 1.3% fail on Valves
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.78% fail on Leaks
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
8.5% fail on
Components
-
9.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.8% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Brake operation
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.90% fail on
Hub components
(60% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Brake pads
- 0.26% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.39% fail on Cable
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.26% fail on
Pedal
- 0.26% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.26% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(30% better than other 1996 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting (51% better than other 1996 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Spring mounting
- 3.9% fail on Subframe mounting (89% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Rear (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Front
-
2.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.39% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.26% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Spring eye
- 0.26% fail on General condition
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.13% fail on Presence
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Clearance
-
9.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(28% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 9.0% fail on Wipers (47% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
- 0.39% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.78% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.39% fail on Pipe
- 0.26% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Cap
-
7.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.2% fail on Chassis
- 2.8% fail on Body condition
-
0.78% fail on
Seats
- 0.65% fail on Drivers
- 0.13% fail on Passengers
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
- 0.26% fail on Passengers other
- 0.13% fail on Passengers front
- 0.13% fail on Body security
-
3.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
4.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Requirements
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
(46% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
- 0.90% fail on Operation
- 0.78% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.26% fail on Drive system
- 0.26% fail on Other components
-
1.0% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
-
0.65% fail on
Steering control
-
0.39% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.39% fail on Universal joint
- 0.13% fail on Steering lock
- 0.13% fail on Steering column
-
0.39% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.13% fail on Steering operation
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(44% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on Tread depth (83% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
-
0.39% fail on
Towbars
- 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.13% fail on Towbar
-
0.39% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.39% fail on Registration plate