Peugeot Boxer MOT Results
Registered in 199659.3% pass rate
from 783 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% better than other 1996 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.7% fail on Horn
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.51% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.38% fail on Position lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
0.13% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.38% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.26% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Rbt
-
5.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.64% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
-
5.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.77% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake drums
-
0.51% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.51% fail on Brake pads
-
0.38% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.38% fail on Cable
-
0.77% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.89% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.77% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Leaks
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.38% fail on Hand lever
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.38% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.26% fail on Valves
- 0.13% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.26% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.13% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.26% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Visibility
(30% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Wipers (56% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Washers
-
0.38% fail on
View to rear
- 0.38% fail on Mirrors
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
4.0% fail on
Chassis
- 4.0% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(58% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
- 0.13% fail on Bearing housing
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.13% fail on System
-
0.38% fail on
Cabs
- 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
-
0.26% fail on
Doors
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.13% fail on Floor
- 0.13% fail on Undertray
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(33% better than other 1996 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (37% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(64% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.89% fail on
Springs
- 0.64% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.13% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.13% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.38% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
-
0.13% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.51% fail on
Compression ignition
(75% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(51% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
(50% better than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
(50% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.77% fail on Tread depth
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(68% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
- 0.64% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.38% fail on Operation
-
0.26% fail on
Steering gear
(87% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
-
0.51% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.38% fail on Registration plates
- 0.13% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.13% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.13% fail on Speedometer