MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 1996
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1996
57.7% pass rate
from 859 tests in 2020
(10% better than other 1996 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (95% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (95% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 5.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.2% fail on Horn
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.47% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.93% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 1996 vans)
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.0% fail on Lever
    • 0.93% fail on Mechanical brake components (66% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.35% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Brake pads (73% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Linkage
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.47% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.47% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.23% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.12% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.23% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.12% fail on Servos
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Springs
      • 0.47% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.12% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.12% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Visibility (42% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Wipers (68% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.47% fail on Strengthening plate (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.23% fail on Strengthening plate (13 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Joints
    • 0.70% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on System
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar
      • 0.35% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Floor
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Carrier
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Steps
    • 0.12% fail on Undertray
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition (80% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.70% fail on Compression ignition (69% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (68% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Power steering
      • 0.58% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear (82% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.12% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (73% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Tread depth (90% better than other 1996 vans)
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates