MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Boxer » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.0% pass rate
from 2,307 tests in 2017
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front lamps (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Rear lamps (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (33% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (33% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.82% fail on Individual lamps (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.043% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 0.39% fail on Horn
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.043% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.043% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.043% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.043% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.74% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Components (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Hoses
        • 0.087% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.043% fail on Pipes
      • 0.043% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.26% fail on ABS
    • 0.17% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
      • 0.043% fail on Lever
    • 0.043% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.043% fail on Warning
    • 0.043% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Windscreen (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.2% fail on Suspension (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Front drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.087% fail on Shackle
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Clearance (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Air suspension (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.087% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.043% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.043% fail on Front
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Tread depth (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on System
      • 0.087% fail on Cap
      • 0.043% fail on Tank
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.95% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.30% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Emergency exits (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.043% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers
    • 0.13% fail on Steps and stairs (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Retractable steps (43 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Body security
    • 0.043% fail on Load security
      • 0.043% fail on Loading door
    • 0.043% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.69% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment
      • 0.043% fail on Installation check
        • 0.043% fail on Anchorage's
      • 0.043% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering system (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
    • 0.087% fail on Steering control
      • 0.087% fail on Steering column
  • 0.22% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Speed limiter plate (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.22% fail on Registration plates and VIN (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plate (73% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.043% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.043% fail on Attachment