Peugeot Boxer MOT Results
Registered in 201079.0% pass rate
from 2,307 tests in 2017
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Position lamps
(71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front lamps (81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.00% fail on Rear lamps (45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.087% fail on All position lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(33% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(33% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.82% fail on Individual lamps (53% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(33% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
(51% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.043% fail on Tell tale
- 0.043% fail on Switch
- 0.39% fail on Horn
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.043% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.043% fail on Front lamps
- 0.043% fail on Rear lamps
-
0.043% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.043% fail on Switch
-
6.2% fail on
Brakes
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.74% fail on Front wheels
- 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
(66% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Brake discs (88% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.52% fail on Condition
-
0.26% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Components
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Hoses
- 0.087% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.043% fail on Pipes
- 0.043% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Components
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.26% fail on ABS
-
0.17% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.13% fail on Cable
- 0.043% fail on Lever
-
0.043% fail on
Full power hydraulic systems
- 0.043% fail on Warning
- 0.043% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(43% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers (36% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Windscreen (70% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Bonnet
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.61% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Leaf springs
(83% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.087% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.087% fail on Shackle
- 0.043% fail on Condition
-
0.087% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
(6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Clearance (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.087% fail on
Air suspension
(8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Operation
- 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.087% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(98% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.043% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.043% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.043% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.043% fail on Front
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
(66% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.65% fail on Tread depth (82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on System
- 0.087% fail on Cap
- 0.043% fail on Tank
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.95% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.30% fail on Body condition
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Emergency exits (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.087% fail on Passengers front
- 0.043% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.087% fail on Passengers
-
0.13% fail on
Steps and stairs
(26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Retractable steps (43 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Body security
-
0.043% fail on
Load security
- 0.043% fail on Loading door
- 0.043% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.69% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(46% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.26% fail on Condition
- 0.087% fail on Attachment
-
0.043% fail on
Installation check
- 0.043% fail on Anchorage's
- 0.043% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.52% fail on
Steering
(86% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Steering system
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.043% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.043% fail on Operation
-
0.087% fail on
Steering control
- 0.087% fail on Steering column
-
0.26% fail on
Steering system
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
(9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Speed limiter plate (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Registration plate (73% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.043% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.043% fail on Attachment