Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2016
75.6% pass rate
from 11,640 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.043% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0086% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.82% fail on Stop lamp (54% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on All outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Position lamp (35% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.017% fail on Switch
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.043% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0086% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors (49% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.052% fail on Daytime running lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0086% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0086% fail on Switch
    • 0.0086% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0086% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0086% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0086% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0086% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.84% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.095% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0086% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0086% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.069% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Cable
        • 0.043% fail on Pivot (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0086% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (52% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.077% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0086% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.026% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.017% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0086% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0086% fail on Servos
    • 0.0086% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0086% fail on Other components
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility (24% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors (58% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0086% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.60% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.59% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0086% fail on Window
    • 0.095% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (29% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
    • 0.0086% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Body (92% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Panel (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Transmission (53% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Drive shafts (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Joints (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0086% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.043% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.043% fail on Joints
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Seats (99% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.060% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.043% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Tank
      • 0.034% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0086% fail on Pipe
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.052% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.043% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0086% fail on Catch
        • 0.0086% fail on Hinge
      • 0.017% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
    • 0.034% fail on Undertray
    • 0.026% fail on Load security
      • 0.026% fail on Loading door
    • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.017% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0086% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0086% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0086% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0086% fail on Carrier
    • 0.0086% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0086% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0086% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0086% fail on Steps
  • 1.6% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension arms (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Springs (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.052% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.017% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.069% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.069% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.060% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage ball joints (67% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Bellows (29 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0086% fail on Operation
    • 0.017% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0086% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0086% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0086% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0086% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0086% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0086% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0086% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (29% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.026% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.017% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0086% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.017% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0086% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.017% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0086% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Requirements
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.017% fail on Airbags
      • 0.017% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.54% fail on Steering (59% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0086% fail on Pump
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0086% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.034% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0086% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0086% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle (48% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plates (48% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.17% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Steps and stairs (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Steps (24 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Retractable steps (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.017% fail on Doors
      • 0.017% fail on Emergency exits
    • 0.0086% fail on Passenger grab handles
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.086% fail on Attachment
    • 0.069% fail on Condition
  • 0.026% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Speed limiter (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Speed limiter plate (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)