Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2016
72.5% pass rate
from 11,156 tests in 2021
(7.5% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.054% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.65% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.090% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.090% fail on Horn
      • 0.054% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.081% fail on Rear reflectors (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0090% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0090% fail on Switch
  • 10% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.027% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.081% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0090% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.36% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.099% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (17% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (16% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (16% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums (35% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Brake discs (35% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
        • 0.099% fail on Pivot (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Lever
        • 0.054% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.018% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.0090% fail on Rod
        • 0.0090% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
      • 0.036% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (49% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0090% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.018% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0090% fail on Other components
      • 0.0090% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0090% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.0090% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0090% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0090% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (32% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on View to rear (59% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors (58% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.53% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0090% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.0090% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (74% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0090% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.56% fail on Springs (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (70% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.081% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.036% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0090% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.0090% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.0090% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.018% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.081% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage ball joints (92% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0090% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0090% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0090% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0090% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.027% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0090% fail on Axle
    • 0.027% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Operation (19 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0090% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.0090% fail on Bellows
    • 0.0090% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0090% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type (90% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (36% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.054% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.045% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.027% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.0090% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0090% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.0090% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.49% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.0090% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0090% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.78% fail on Transmission
      • 0.75% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.74% fail on Joints
        • 0.0090% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.027% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.027% fail on Joints
    • 0.56% fail on Body (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Other body component (72% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Panel
      • 0.018% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.16% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.072% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.045% fail on Door condition
        • 0.018% fail on Catch
      • 0.045% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0090% fail on Catch
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0090% fail on Catch
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.063% fail on Tank
      • 0.027% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0090% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0090% fail on System
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.099% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.045% fail on Loading door
      • 0.0090% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.0090% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.036% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.018% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0090% fail on Coupling
      • 0.0090% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0090% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0090% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0090% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0090% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0090% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0090% fail on Carrier
    • 0.0090% fail on Floor
    • 0.0090% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0090% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0090% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0090% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0090% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.57% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment
      • 0.045% fail on Requirements
      • 0.018% fail on Pre-tensioners
      • 0.0090% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0090% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0090% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.81% fail on Steering
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.018% fail on Operation
      • 0.0090% fail on Pump
      • 0.0090% fail on Rams
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0090% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.054% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.054% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.018% fail on Steering play
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0090% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0090% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle (44% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plates (44% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.15% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steps and stairs (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Steps (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Retractable steps
    • 0.054% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Emergency exits (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0090% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.099% fail on Attachment
    • 0.045% fail on Condition
  • 0.027% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Speed limiter (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Speed limiter plate (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)