MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Expert » 2000

Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.9% pass rate
from 606 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps (53% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp (57% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.99% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.50% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
      • 0.17% fail on Lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 30% fail on Suspension (27% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.8% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.17% fail on Couplings
    • 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints (76% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Trailing arms (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Front
      • 0.33% fail on Rear
    • 0.66% fail on Panhard rods (18 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment (27 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Axles
      • 0.17% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.17% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 12% fail on Components
        • 5.8% fail on Hoses (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Valves
        • 0.66% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.17% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.66% fail on Operation
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.99% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Wheel cylinder (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.99% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.99% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.33% fail on Lever (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 0.50% fail on ABS
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Components
        • 0.17% fail on Servos
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Mirrors (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System
      • 0.50% fail on Pipe
      • 0.17% fail on Cap
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Size/type
    • 0.33% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.1% fail on Steering
    • 8.1% fail on Steering system
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 3.3% fail on Steering rack (83% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.83% fail on Power steering
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.33% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition (67% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Body security
    • 0.33% fail on Load security
      • 0.17% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.17% fail on Loading door
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.50% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.33% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.33% fail on Towbars
    • 0.33% fail on Vehicle structure