Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2003
47.4% pass rate
from 1,473 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Suspension arms (51% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.1% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.14% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Axles (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Axle (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Anti-roll bar
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (57% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (57% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.88% fail on Electrical equipment (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.34% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn (89% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.068% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.068% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Transmission (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (99% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Joints (98% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.068% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (62% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame condition (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on System
      • 0.27% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Tank
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
        • 0.068% fail on Catch
      • 0.068% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.068% fail on Door condition
    • 0.48% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Other body component
      • 0.068% fail on Panel
    • 0.41% fail on Towbar
      • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.068% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.068% fail on Carrier
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.068% fail on Load security
      • 0.068% fail on Loading door
  • 15% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.068% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (56% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.068% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.068% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (47% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
        • 0.068% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.95% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.20% fail on Valves
      • 0.068% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.068% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.41% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.068% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.068% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.068% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.068% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.068% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers (31% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.34% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.068% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (90% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.068% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.068% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.068% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.068% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.068% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.068% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.068% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.068% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
      • 0.41% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (34% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components (38% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.068% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.95% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.41% fail on Other components
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Rams
    • 0.61% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.068% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.068% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.75% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Speedometer (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment