Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.7% pass rate
from 769 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (86% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (37% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Front lamps (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual lamps (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.26% fail on Tell tales (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Switch
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (52% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Horn (63% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 29% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage condition
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (86% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Front drive shafts (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Couplings
    • 4.3% fail on Front suspension joints (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 0.78% fail on Rear
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting (76% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.13% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.13% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.13% fail on Clearance
    • 0.26% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on General condition
    • 0.13% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Valves (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes
        • 2.6% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.65% fail on Pedal
        • 0.65% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.26% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pivot
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Valves
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.78% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 12% fail on Tyres (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth (54% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Tank
      • 0.52% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
    • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 8.7% fail on Steering system
      • 7.3% fail on Track rod end (87% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
  • 4.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (67% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition (71% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Drivers
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis (80% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition