MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2002

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.4% pass rate
from 3,028 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.5% fail on Front lamps (30% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.099% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Direction indicators (87% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Flashing type (87% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Individual lamps (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.033% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.033% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (52% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Matched pair (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.76% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.099% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.066% fail on Hazard warning (91% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Lamp
      • 0.033% fail on Switch
    • 0.033% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment
    • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Front drive shafts (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.066% fail on Couplings
      • 0.033% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms (25% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
      • 0.033% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Coil springs (96% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Location
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front
      • 0.50% fail on Rear
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (29% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Spring mounting (97% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Macpherson strut (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.033% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Torsion bars (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on General condition
    • 0.066% fail on Axles
      • 0.066% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.066% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 19% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (23% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Components (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Valves (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes (19% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Hoses (39% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.033% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.50% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.066% fail on Operation
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.033% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
    • 0.066% fail on Mechanical components (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Lever
      • 0.033% fail on Cable
    • 0.033% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.96% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.96% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.099% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (27% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.56% fail on Fuel system (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Cap (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Hose
      • 0.066% fail on Pipe
  • 6.2% fail on Steering (18% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system (24% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.89% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Free play
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.066% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.033% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.033% fail on Other components
        • 0.033% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.56% fail on Other components (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.066% fail on Pump
      • 0.033% fail on Rams
    • 0.33% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.066% fail on Steering control
      • 0.066% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.066% fail on Universal joint
  • 5.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (37% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
      • 0.033% fail on Requirements
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (61% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Doors
      • 0.56% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
      • 0.099% fail on Passengers front (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
    • 0.066% fail on Body security
    • 0.066% fail on Load security
      • 0.033% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.033% fail on Loading door
    • 0.033% fail on Engine mountings
  • 0.83% fail on Registration plates and VIN (39% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 0.17% fail on Towbars
    • 0.099% fail on Towbar
    • 0.066% fail on Vehicle structure