MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.1% pass rate
from 2,241 tests in 2020
(9.1% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (98% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.089% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (26% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Switch (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.045% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.045% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.045% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Ball joint (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (66% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.089% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Coil springs (97% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (69% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Axles
      • 0.18% fail on Axle (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.089% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance (34% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.089% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.089% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.6% fail on Load sensing valves (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
      • 0.045% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.089% fail on Valves
      • 0.045% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.045% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.089% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
      • 0.045% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.045% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.045% fail on Leaks
    • 0.045% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.5% fail on Transmission (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Joints (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (89% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
      • 0.045% fail on Belts
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Other passenger's door (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Door condition (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Catch
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.089% fail on Catch (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Door condition
    • 0.71% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.31% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (73% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis condition (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Carrier (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system (58% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.13% fail on System
      • 0.045% fail on Hose
    • 0.45% fail on Body (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Other body component
      • 0.089% fail on Panel (81% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.089% fail on Towbar
      • 0.089% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.045% fail on Cabs
      • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.045% fail on Undertray
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.089% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
        • 0.045% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (97% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Other components
      • 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Rams (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.045% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.045% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.045% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (34% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.045% fail on Requirements
    • 0.089% fail on Airbags
      • 0.089% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (44% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.045% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.045% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.98% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.089% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 0.045% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.045% fail on Belt(s)/padding