Peugeot Partner MOT Results
Registered in 200246.4% pass rate
from 3,028 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.5% fail on Front lamps (30% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.099% fail on All position lamps
- 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
7.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(87% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Flashing type
(87% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Individual lamps (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.56% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.033% fail on Tell tales
- 0.033% fail on Switch
-
7.8% fail on
Flashing type
(87% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2002 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
(52% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Matched pair (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Battery
-
0.92% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(78% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.033% fail on Tell tale
- 0.76% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.099% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.066% fail on
Hazard warning
(91% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.033% fail on Lamp
- 0.033% fail on Switch
- 0.033% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
7.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(56% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.066% fail on Attachment
-
6.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(42% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.066% fail on Couplings
-
0.033% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(25% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.033% fail on Condition
-
4.8% fail on
Coil springs
(96% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.033% fail on Location
-
2.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.8% fail on Front
- 0.50% fail on Rear
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (29% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(79% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting (76% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Spring mounting (97% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.79% fail on
Macpherson strut
(120% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.79% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Shock absorbers
(75% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.033% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.066% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.099% fail on
Torsion bars
(9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on General condition
-
0.066% fail on
Axles
- 0.066% fail on Stub axle
- 0.066% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
7.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(56% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(13% better than other 2002 vans)
-
13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(23% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
12% fail on
Components
(24% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Valves (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Pipes (19% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Hoses (39% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.033% fail on Cylinders
- 0.50% fail on Leaks
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.066% fail on Operation
-
12% fail on
Components
(24% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Brake performance
(43% better than other 2002 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Front wheels
- 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (59% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.033% fail on Brake operation
-
3.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Parking brake
(63% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
- 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
- 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.13% fail on ABS
-
0.066% fail on
Mechanical components
(88% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.033% fail on Lever
- 0.033% fail on Cable
- 0.033% fail on Electronic stability system
-
13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(23% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 5.4% fail on Washers
- 0.96% fail on Windscreen
- 0.96% fail on Mirrors
- 0.099% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(34% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Size/type
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(27% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions
- 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.56% fail on
Fuel system
(60% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.30% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Cap (73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Hose
- 0.066% fail on Pipe
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
(18% better than other 2002 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
(24% better than other 2002 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.89% fail on Steering rack
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
-
0.13% fail on
Free play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
- 0.066% fail on Steering arm
- 0.033% fail on Steering damper
-
0.033% fail on
Other components
- 0.033% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.56% fail on Other components (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Operation
- 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.066% fail on Pump
- 0.033% fail on Rams
- 0.33% fail on Steering operation
-
0.066% fail on
Steering control
-
0.066% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.066% fail on Universal joint
-
0.066% fail on
Steering coupling
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
(24% better than other 2002 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
(37% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Condition
- 0.033% fail on Requirements
- 0.033% fail on Attachment
-
3.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(61% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.86% fail on
Doors
- 0.56% fail on Passengers other
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
- 0.099% fail on Passengers front (78% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Vehicle structure
(84% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Seats
- 0.23% fail on Drivers
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
- 0.066% fail on Body security
-
0.066% fail on
Load security
- 0.033% fail on Bootlid
- 0.033% fail on Loading door
- 0.033% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.83% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(39% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Registration plate
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Towbars
- 0.099% fail on Towbar
- 0.066% fail on Vehicle structure