Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2005
47.8% pass rate
from 3,821 tests in 2020
(6.5% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (9.9% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.026% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Electrical equipment (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.079% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.026% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.026% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.026% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.026% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.81% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.079% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.026% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.026% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.026% fail on Switch
    • 0.026% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes (95% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.079% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Coil spring (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.026% fail on Torsion bar
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Axles (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Stub axle (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Axle
      • 0.079% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.079% fail on Suspension rod (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes (14% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (24% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.052% fail on Brake performance not tested (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.94% fail on Brake linings and pads (54% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Brake pads (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal
      • 0.052% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system (67% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Lever (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Electronic parking brake (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.026% fail on Additional braking device
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (15% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (32% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.026% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.026% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.052% fail on Prop shafts (94% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.97% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.97% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Front passenger's door (79% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.026% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.026% fail on Catch
    • 0.47% fail on Integral vehicle structure (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.39% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Carrier (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.31% fail on Body (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
      • 0.052% fail on Panel (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.026% fail on Hose
      • 0.026% fail on Pipe
      • 0.026% fail on System
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.079% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.026% fail on Bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.10% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.079% fail on Chassis (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Chassis condition (96% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.026% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 8.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Requirements
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components (19% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.5% fail on Steering gear (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Steering rack (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (67% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Operation (99% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
      • 0.052% fail on Rams
      • 0.026% fail on Pump
    • 0.29% fail on Steering wheel (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering play
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.13% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.026% fail on Steering column
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (19% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (29% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.026% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.026% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.92% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.73% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.026% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.026% fail on Undertray
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates (65% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.026% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.026% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.026% fail on Steps