MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2005

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.2% pass rate
from 2,758 tests in 2021
(6.6% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.036% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (79% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (33% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.76% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.036% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.073% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.036% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 4.1% fail on Coil springs (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Coil spring (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.83% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.18% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.073% fail on Axle
      • 0.036% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.036% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension rod (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.036% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.4% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.83% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (86% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Lever
        • 0.036% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (47% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.073% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 4.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.036% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.036% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.036% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.036% fail on Hinge
      • 0.036% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Chassis (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Chassis condition (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
      • 0.18% fail on Panel
      • 0.036% fail on Body condition
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.33% fail on Spare wheel (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Carrier (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.073% fail on Tank
      • 0.036% fail on Hose
    • 0.073% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.073% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.036% fail on Load security
      • 0.036% fail on Loading door
    • 0.036% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.036% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.036% fail on Cabs
      • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 10.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.44% fail on View to rear
      • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.073% fail on Passengers airbag (17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 8.0% fail on Steering (25% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.073% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
        • 0.073% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.036% fail on Steering arm
    • 2.6% fail on Steering gear (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Other components (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Rams (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Pump
    • 0.29% fail on Steering wheel (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Steering play
      • 0.073% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.036% fail on Steering column
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.073% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.036% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.036% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.073% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.98% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.94% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.073% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.036% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2005 vans)