MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Piaggio » Porter » 2008
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2008
54.4% pass rate
from 149 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (12 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (12 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 15% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 4.7% fail on Load sensing valves (18 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.67% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.67% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.67% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.67% fail on Lever
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.67% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.67% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.0% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Tank
    • 2.0% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat (13 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.67% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.67% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.67% fail on Transmission
      • 0.67% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.67% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.67% fail on Body
      • 0.67% fail on Other body component
    • 0.67% fail on Load security
      • 0.67% fail on Loading door
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (86% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (93% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (46 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Emissions not tested (69 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.67% fail on View to rear
      • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.67% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.67% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.67% fail on Condition
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.67% fail on Steering
    • 0.67% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.67% fail on Track rod end