MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Piaggio » Porter » 2008
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2008
51.7% pass rate
from 143 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Tell tale (37 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.70% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.70% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.70% fail on Lamp
  • 27% fail on Brakes (66% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 7.0% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Components
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Valves (11 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Hoses
      • 2.8% fail on Leaks (11 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.70% fail on Hub components
      • 0.70% fail on Brake pads
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions (10 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Tank
      • 0.70% fail on Cap
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.70% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.1% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.70% fail on Rear
    • 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 7.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Drivers
      • 0.70% fail on Passengers front
    • 2.8% fail on Seats (12 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Passengers (29 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.70% fail on Chassis
    • 0.70% fail on Body condition
    • 0.70% fail on Load security
      • 0.70% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.70% fail on Condition
  • 3.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Other components (59 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Steering pivot point (63 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.70% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas