Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.1% pass rate
from 77 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.9% fail on Horn
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (14 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 12% fail on Service brake performance (20 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Load sensing valves (23 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Master cylinder
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 7.8% fail on Washers
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Emissions not tested (109 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (24 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Seats (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Tank
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.3% fail on Other body component
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.3% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Intermediate drop arm
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition