MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Piaggio » Porter » 2009

Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.2% pass rate
from 55 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Electrical equipment (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Horn (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    • 9.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 7.3% fail on Load sensing valves (42 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.8% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 18% fail on Spark ignition (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 9.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (63 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 5.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Emissions not tested (41 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.8% fail on Other leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Tank
      • 1.8% fail on Pipe
    • 3.6% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.8% fail on Hinge
      • 1.8% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Seats
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.8% fail on Leaf spring
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Steering play
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack