MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Kangoo » 1999
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 1999
39.9% pass rate
from 429 tests in 2017
(24% worse than other 1999 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 39% fail on Suspension (74% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 21% fail on Prescribed areas (96% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Spring mounting
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Couplings
      • 0.23% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.2% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.9% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Front
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.93% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.70% fail on Tie bars/rods (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on General condition
    • 0.23% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 17% fail on Registration plate lamp (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.23% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.9% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Switch
      • 0.47% fail on Tell tale (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.70% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.70% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Fog lamp (83% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.47% fail on Brake operation (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (42% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Components (41% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes
        • 2.1% fail on Valves
        • 0.47% fail on Hoses (81% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.23% fail on Leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
        • 0.93% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on ABS
    • 0.23% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Steering (90% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Free play
        • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 12% fail on Tyres (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth (77% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Size/type
  • 12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
    • 2.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Pipe
      • 0.47% fail on System
    • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.2% fail on Body condition
    • 3.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.70% fail on Drivers
      • 0.70% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.47% fail on Engine mountings (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.23% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.47% fail on Towbars
    • 0.47% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment