Renault Kangoo MOT Results
Registered in 200041.4% pass rate
from 1,499 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.
-
36% fail on
Suspension
(53% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(51% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 12% fail on Component mounting (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Spring mounting (94% better than other 2000 vans)
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(200% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Couplings
- 0.067% fail on Drive shafts
-
10% fail on
Front drive shafts
(200% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
6.1% fail on
Coil springs
(4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Front
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
3.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(65% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.87% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.87% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Bonded suspension
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.067% fail on Condition
- 0.067% fail on Attachment
- 0.067% fail on General condition
-
0.067% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.067% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.067% fail on Attachment
- 0.067% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
17% fail on
Prescribed areas
(51% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 15% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps (44% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on All position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
0.067% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.067% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.067% fail on Switch
- 0.067% fail on Dipswitch
- 2.7% fail on Horn
- 1.8% fail on Battery
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.067% fail on Switch
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Hazard warning
(190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Lamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.93% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(78% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.067% fail on Tell tale
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 6.0% fail on Front wheels
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (41% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.067% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(53% better than other 2000 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Components
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Pipes (60% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Valves
- 0.60% fail on Hoses (70% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.067% fail on Cylinders
- 0.33% fail on Leaks
- 0.20% fail on Operation
- 0.067% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Components
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake
(120% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.47% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.27% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.067% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on ABS
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.067% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.067% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(41% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.1% fail on Washers (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Mirrors
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
13% fail on
Steering
(77% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Free play
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack
- 0.067% fail on Drag link end
- 0.067% fail on Steering arm
-
0.47% fail on
Power steering
- 0.33% fail on Operation
- 0.067% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.067% fail on Rams
- 0.20% fail on Steering operation
-
0.13% fail on
Steering control
-
0.13% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.067% fail on Flexible coupling
- 0.067% fail on Universal joint
-
0.13% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.067% fail on Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(43% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.5% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.87% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
- 0.27% fail on System
- 0.20% fail on Hose
- 0.067% fail on Tank
- 0.067% fail on Cap
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(98% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Seat belts
(42% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.5% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
-
4.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.067% fail on Drivers airbag
-
7.3% fail on
Seat belts
(42% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(35% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 0.73% fail on Size/type
- 0.20% fail on Valve stem
-
8.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.4% fail on Body condition
-
2.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Chassis
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
- 0.93% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.067% fail on Passengers front
- 1.1% fail on Engine mountings (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Seats
- 0.47% fail on Passengers
- 0.33% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.067% fail on
Load security
- 0.067% fail on Bootlid
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.067% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Towbars
- 0.13% fail on Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure