Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.5% pass rate
from 417 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Coil springs (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage
      • 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.72% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.72% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Joints
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.96% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
    • 0.48% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.24% fail on Floor
    • 0.24% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.24% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 17% fail on Visibility (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Washers (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt
          • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.24% fail on Servos
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.96% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.72% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (83% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
  • 9.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.48% fail on Other components
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Spark ignition (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Emissions not tested (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.24% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.72% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.24% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.24% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.96% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Airbags
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates