Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
41.4% pass rate
from 1,499 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Suspension (53% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting (94% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Couplings
        • 0.067% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 6.1% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.87% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Bonded suspension (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.067% fail on General condition
    • 0.067% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.067% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.067% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps (44% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.067% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.067% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.067% fail on Switch
      • 0.067% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.7% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (54% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.067% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Lamp (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (41% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.067% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (53% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Components (54% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes (60% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Valves
        • 0.60% fail on Hoses (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.067% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.33% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.067% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.47% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.27% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.067% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.067% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 17% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Washers (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 13% fail on Steering (77% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Free play
        • 0.27% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.067% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.067% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.47% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
      • 0.067% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.067% fail on Rams
    • 0.20% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.13% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.067% fail on Flexible coupling
        • 0.067% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.067% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
      • 0.27% fail on System
      • 0.20% fail on Hose
      • 0.067% fail on Tank
      • 0.067% fail on Cap
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (98% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Seat belts (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 4.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 10% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (36% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Size/type
    • 0.20% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.93% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.067% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.1% fail on Engine mountings (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.47% fail on Passengers
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers
    • 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.067% fail on Load security
      • 0.067% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Attachment
  • 0.20% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure