Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
42.9% pass rate
from 823 tests in 2020
(22% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Coil springs (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Torsion bars (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Torsion bar (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (98% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.73% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.36% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust system (91% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.61% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
    • 0.73% fail on Towbar
      • 0.61% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.73% fail on Engine mounting (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Bracket
    • 0.36% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Floor
    • 0.24% fail on Boot lid (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.97% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.61% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (86% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 0.36% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.24% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (52% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.61% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (45% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.61% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
    • 0.85% fail on Load sensing valves (60% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.12% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Visibility (54% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Washers (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.61% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.61% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.61% fail on View to rear
      • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.49% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet
  • 13% fail on Steering (86% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Steering linkage components (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
    • 6.3% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering box
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Pump (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 4.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (45% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.24% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.85% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment