Renault Kangoo MOT Results
Registered in 200047.5% pass rate
from 417 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(31% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Linkage
- 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.72% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.72% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.48% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
22% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(47% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.72% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.72% fail on Joints
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(190% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
- 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.24% fail on Tank
- 0.24% fail on Pipe
-
0.48% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.24% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.24% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.24% fail on Floor
-
0.24% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.24% fail on Boot lid condition
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
17% fail on
Visibility
(68% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Washers (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Wipers
-
2.2% fail on
View to rear
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Bonnet
-
0.24% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.48% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt
- 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt
-
6.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(180% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
2.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(180% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.24% fail on Servos
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.24% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(26% better than other 2000 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(58% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.96% fail on Horn
- 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.72% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
9.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.8% fail on
Steering gear
(110% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Drag link end
-
0.72% fail on
Power steering
- 0.48% fail on Other components
- 0.24% fail on Operation
-
0.24% fail on
Steering play
- 0.24% fail on Steering rack
-
4.8% fail on
Steering gear
(110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Emissions not tested (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.24% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.72% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.24% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.24% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.96% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.24% fail on Other leaks
-
9.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
6.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Airbags
- 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates