Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Renault Kangoo MOT Results
Registered in 200443.8% pass rate
from 4,991 tests in 2017
(9.6% worse than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(9.2% better than other 2004 vans)
- 15% fail on Registration plate lamp (31% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Position lamps
(16% better than other 2004 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (60% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.080% fail on All position lamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(39% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Switch
- 0.040% fail on Dipswitch
- 2.0% fail on Battery (31% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Hazard warning
(77% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Switch (97% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Lamp
- 1.3% fail on Horn (37% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.96% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Switch
- 0.020% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.96% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Fog lamp (83% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Tell tale
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors (58% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(8.8% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(170% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Location
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment (67% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Presence
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(32% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
6.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(37% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(36% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Couplings
- 0.020% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.18% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
(36% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Front suspension joints (60% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(31% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Front (27% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(40% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.54% fail on
Macpherson strut
(100% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.040% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(98% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.020% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.020% fail on Other components
-
0.020% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
0.020% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
0.020% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(170% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.3% fail on Rear wheels (33% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Front wheels (58% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.020% fail on Brake operation
-
7.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(16% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Components
(14% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Valves (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Pipes (52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Hoses
- 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.060% fail on Cylinders
- 0.020% fail on Servos
- 0.24% fail on Leaks (50% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.060% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (79% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Components
(14% better than other 2004 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (90% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.040% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
- 0.020% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake
(64% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.60% fail on ABS (52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Restricted movement (87% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
- 0.42% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.040% fail on Condition
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
Mechanical components
(55% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Cable (69% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Lever
- 0.020% fail on Pivot
-
0.060% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.040% fail on
Components
- 0.040% fail on Valves
- 0.020% fail on Leaks
-
0.040% fail on
Components
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Steering
(100% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(130% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Track rod end (78% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
-
0.28% fail on
Free play
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack
- 0.16% fail on Drag link end
- 0.12% fail on Steering arm
-
0.060% fail on
Other components
- 0.040% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.020% fail on Steering component
-
0.96% fail on
Power steering
- 0.62% fail on Operation (63% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.040% fail on Pump
- 0.020% fail on Rams
- 0.080% fail on Steering operation
-
0.060% fail on
Steering control
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Steering column
- 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(130% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(15% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.0% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.86% fail on Windscreen
- 0.80% fail on Mirrors
- 0.080% fail on Indirect vision devices (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Bonnet (74% better than other 2004 vans)
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(25% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Tread depth (28% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Condition (23% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Size/type (75% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Valve stem
-
7.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(45% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.44% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.020% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Requirements
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas (96% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.5% fail on Emissions (61% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
(70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Hose (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Tank
- 0.060% fail on Pipe
- 0.060% fail on System (84% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Cap (88% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(69% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Doors
- 0.48% fail on Passengers other
- 0.24% fail on Drivers
- 0.060% fail on Passengers front (74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.30% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.26% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.10% fail on Body condition (97% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.080% fail on
Load security
- 0.060% fail on Bootlid (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.020% fail on Tailgate
- 0.060% fail on Body security
- 0.020% fail on Speedometer
-
0.020% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.020% fail on Chassis
-
0.76% fail on
Doors
-
0.92% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate
- 0.060% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Attachment