Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
44.7% pass rate
from 5,100 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (6.9% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 15% fail on Registration plate lamp (43% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps (12% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (61% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Switch (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.020% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.020% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Switch (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Lamp
      • 0.078% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (39% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Switch
        • 0.020% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Fog lamp (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.078% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 26% fail on Suspension (13% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Location
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 6.1% fail on Drive shafts (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Front drive shafts (60% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Couplings
        • 0.020% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.098% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.098% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.8% fail on Front suspension joints (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Front (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.078% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.078% fail on Prescribed areas (98% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Component mounting (99% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Subframe mounting (93% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Rear wheels (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake operation (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.039% fail on Parking brake operation (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Components (19% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Pipes (40% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Valves (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Hoses
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.078% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.31% fail on Leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.039% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.020% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.020% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on ABS (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.43% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.059% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.41% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.31% fail on Cable
      • 0.039% fail on Linkage
      • 0.039% fail on Lever
      • 0.020% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.039% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
      • 0.020% fail on Components
        • 0.020% fail on Servos
  • 14% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Track rod end (80% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Free play
        • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.078% fail on Other components
        • 0.078% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.039% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Operation (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.039% fail on Pump
      • 0.020% fail on Drive system
      • 0.020% fail on Rams
    • 0.059% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (13% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.92% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.80% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.039% fail on Bonnet (79% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 11% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Size/type (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers airbag (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Requirements
      • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas (98% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
  • 6.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.078% fail on Pipe
      • 0.059% fail on System (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Cap
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.33% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.18% fail on Body condition (94% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.059% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.020% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.020% fail on Loading door
    • 0.039% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.88% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment