Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.0% pass rate
from 5,507 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.036% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.036% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.018% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.018% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Tell tale (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.64% fail on Hazard warning (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Switch (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Lamp
      • 0.018% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.27% fail on Battery
    • 0.18% fail on Horn (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.018% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 15% fail on Suspension (11% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Couplings
      • 0.091% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.091% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.4% fail on Coil springs (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Location
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.93% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage condition (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers (33% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.73% fail on Wheel bearings (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Front (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
    • 0.054% fail on Macpherson strut (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.018% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.018% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 13% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.091% fail on Free play
        • 0.091% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.018% fail on Other components
        • 0.018% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.036% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.018% fail on Power steering
      • 0.018% fail on Operation
    • 0.018% fail on Locking devices
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Hub components (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake pads (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.0% fail on Components
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
        • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.018% fail on Servos
        • 0.018% fail on Valves
      • 0.073% fail on Operation
      • 0.073% fail on Leaks
      • 0.018% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear wheels (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.091% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.76% fail on Pedal
        • 0.58% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.18% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on ABS
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.073% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Cable
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage
    • 0.018% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.018% fail on Components
        • 0.018% fail on Servos
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.036% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
  • 1.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Tank
      • 0.036% fail on System (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.018% fail on Pipe
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.62% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Body condition
    • 0.091% fail on Doors (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.018% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.073% fail on Seats
      • 0.073% fail on Passengers
    • 0.073% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.018% fail on Body security
  • 0.36% fail on Registration plates and VIN (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate (55% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.091% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Renault Kangoo (2009 - 2012)
    Really roomy, with clever, quick, flat folding rear seats that leave a low load floor. Cruise control with speed limiter. 6-speed box.