Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2015
67.8% pass rate
from 4,630 tests in 2020
(34% worse than other 2015 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (75% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Dipswitch (8 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Matched pair
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (49% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (43% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
      • 0.065% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.043% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning (13 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.086% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Side repeaters (95% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on All direction indicators
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility (82% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (76% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.022% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
  • 7.2% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (46% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (75% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (73% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.043% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.022% fail on Cable
        • 0.022% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (78% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (79% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (84% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.043% fail on Anti-lock braking system (84% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.022% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (75% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.043% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Suspension
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.84% fail on Springs
      • 0.84% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.84% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.71% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints (82% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.086% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.022% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.022% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission
      • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
        • 0.043% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.043% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.043% fail on Joints
    • 0.37% fail on Body
      • 0.37% fail on Other body component
    • 0.37% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Catch
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
        • 0.043% fail on Catch (9 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on System
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Carrier
      • 0.086% fail on Spare wheel condition (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.022% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.022% fail on Seats
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.95% fail on Steering
    • 0.84% fail on Steering linkage components (77% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Track rod end (76% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.022% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.086% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.86% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Compression ignition (49% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.043% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (85% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.043% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.043% fail on Undertray
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Attachment
  • 0.22% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (82% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.022% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.022% fail on Belt(s)/padding