Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
71.5% pass rate
from 3,721 tests in 2020
(35% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.081% fail on Dipswitch (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Position lamps (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Position lamp (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning (18 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Switch (18 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.027% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.081% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Main beam tell-tale (15 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Visibility (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition of glass (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Windscreen (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on View to rear
      • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.081% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.081% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (34% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal
    • 0.59% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.027% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.054% fail on Rbt
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.027% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.027% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.081% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.081% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.054% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.027% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.027% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.027% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.027% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.30% fail on Transmission
      • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shaft (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Carrier (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.054% fail on Panel
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.027% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
      • 0.027% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.081% fail on Tank
      • 0.054% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.054% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.054% fail on Undertray
    • 0.027% fail on Seats
      • 0.027% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.027% fail on Power steering
      • 0.027% fail on Operation
  • 0.91% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.027% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Springs (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.054% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.027% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.027% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.67% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.054% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.027% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.054% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.43% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.027% fail on Attachment
  • 0.027% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.027% fail on Belt(s)/padding