MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Kangoo » 2017

Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2017
63.8% pass rate
from 2,592 tests in 2021
(60% worse than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (82% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (90% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.039% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Switch (32 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
      • 0.039% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning (11 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.039% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.039% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Visibility (100% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (88% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Condition of glass (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Windscreen (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.039% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.039% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres (87% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (90% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (31% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (93% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.96% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.23% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (100% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Rigid brake pipes (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.077% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.039% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.039% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.039% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 2.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (82% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.039% fail on Joints
    • 0.39% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.35% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Carrier (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.039% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.039% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.039% fail on Bracket
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Springs
      • 0.66% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.58% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.077% fail on Mounting (13 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.23% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.039% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.039% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.039% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.039% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.039% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.039% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Compression ignition (64% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.039% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.039% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.89% fail on Steering
    • 0.81% fail on Steering linkage components (95% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end (90% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.039% fail on Operation
    • 0.039% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.039% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.077% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment