MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1994
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1994
39.5% pass rate
from 81 tests in 2020
(33% worse than other 1994 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 40% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Headlamps (170% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Direction indicators (190% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Flashing type (190% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 9.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Switch
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 28% fail on Brakes (81% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 14% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 1994 vans)
          • 12% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1994 vans)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.2% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.2% fail on Springs
      • 6.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 23% fail on Visibility (140% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 14% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Washers
    • 4.9% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe
      • 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 2.5% fail on Bumpers
    • 2.5% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Steps (21 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 8.6% fail on Steering
    • 7.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 7.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Steering coupling
      • 1.2% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.5% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (14 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Speedometer (14 times worse than other 1994 vans)
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates