Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1994
44.9% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 12% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (180% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Dipswitch
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 7.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.9% fail on Horn
    • 2.9% fail on Hazard warning
      • 2.9% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
  • 29% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 22% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.4% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 10% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Visibility
    • 12% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.2% fail on Transmission
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.8% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 1.4% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 4.3% fail on Chassis
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition
    • 1.4% fail on Floor
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Steering play
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Requirements
  • 2.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plates