MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1995
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1995
47.7% pass rate
from 149 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Tell tales (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.67% fail on Lamp
      • 0.67% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 28% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 24% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.4% fail on Components
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 3.4% fail on Valves
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.67% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
      • 0.67% fail on Leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.7% fail on Restricted movement (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
        • 0.67% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.67% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.67% fail on Cable
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 8.1% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.67% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.67% fail on Attachment
    • 0.67% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on System
      • 0.67% fail on Tank
      • 0.67% fail on Cap
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.3% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.0% fail on Body condition
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.67% fail on Drivers
    • 0.67% fail on Load security
      • 0.67% fail on Access panel
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.67% fail on Free play
        • 0.67% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.67% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.67% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.67% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate