MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1995

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1995
46.6% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (58% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 13% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 13% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 9.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.85% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Position lamp
  • 26% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 15% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 9.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.85% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 26% fail on Suspension (62% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.85% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.3% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.2% fail on Transmission
      • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Joints
    • 2.5% fail on Body
      • 0.85% fail on Body condition
      • 0.85% fail on Panel
      • 0.85% fail on Other body component
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Hose
      • 0.85% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.85% fail on Load security
      • 0.85% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.85% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.85% fail on Cabs
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.85% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.85% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Requirements