Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1996
44.2% pass rate
from 129 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.78% fail on Horn
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.6% fail on Switch
    • 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.78% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.78% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.0% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension rods (28 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 26% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.78% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission
      • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.78% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.78% fail on Joints
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Body
      • 2.3% fail on Other body component
      • 0.78% fail on Panel
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.78% fail on Pipe
      • 0.78% fail on System
    • 0.78% fail on Doors
      • 0.78% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.78% fail on Door condition
    • 0.78% fail on Floor
    • 0.78% fail on Cabs
      • 0.78% fail on Steps
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (88% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.78% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.78% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.78% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.78% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.78% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.78% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.78% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.78% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.78% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 9.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.2% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.78% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.78% fail on Requirements
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.78% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.78% fail on Speedometer