Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1998
44.4% pass rate
from 475 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 1998 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 18% fail on Prescribed areas (59% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.8% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.8% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Front (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.84% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.21% fail on Shackle
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Axles
      • 0.21% fail on King pins
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.4% fail on Battery
    • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (52% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.42% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear wheels (64% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Front wheels (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.0% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Valves (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
        • 1.5% fail on Anti-slip (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.63% fail on Cable
      • 0.21% fail on Rod
    • 0.84% fail on Hub components
      • 0.63% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
  • 21% fail on Driver's view of the road (88% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 13% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Steering (93% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.21% fail on Steering component
    • 0.84% fail on Steering control
      • 0.63% fail on Steering coupling (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Universal joint (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering column
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
    • 0.42% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.9% fail on Exhaust system (84% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on System
      • 0.42% fail on Cap
    • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.42% fail on Emissions
  • 9.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.8% fail on Body condition
    • 2.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 0.84% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.63% fail on Drivers
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.84% fail on Seats
      • 0.63% fail on Passengers
      • 0.42% fail on Drivers
    • 0.63% fail on Body security
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mountings
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (70% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 0.84% fail on Towbars
    • 0.84% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.42% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate