MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.4% pass rate
from 1,378 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 24% fail on Brake performance (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 8.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 7.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.65% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.073% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt
          • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (71% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Cable
        • 0.51% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Linkage
        • 0.073% fail on Relay lever
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (31% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.94% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Valves
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.073% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies) (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp (34% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Outline marker lamp
      • 0.073% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.22% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.073% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (58% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (39% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.80% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.15% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.15% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.073% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.073% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.073% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.94% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.87% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.87% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.51% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (31 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Operation (39 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Bellows (37 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.073% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.073% fail on Belts
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis (42% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (44% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Body
      • 0.58% fail on Panel
      • 0.36% fail on Other body component
    • 0.80% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.29% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.22% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.073% fail on Towbar
      • 0.073% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.073% fail on Load security
      • 0.073% fail on Dropside
        • 0.073% fail on Other dropside component
    • 0.073% fail on Cabs
      • 0.073% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.073% fail on Window
    • 0.44% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors (70% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.2% fail on Steering (32% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Operation
    • 0.94% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.65% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.073% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.073% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.073% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.073% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.65% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.073% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.073% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.073% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.073% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.073% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.073% fail on Undertray
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (44% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (49% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.073% fail on Airbags
      • 0.073% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.073% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment
  • 0.073% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.073% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.073% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.073% fail on Doors
      • 0.073% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.073% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.073% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.073% fail on Belt(s)/padding