Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.6% pass rate
from 1,106 tests in 2021
(8.4% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 8.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.090% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.99% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.54% fail on Cable
        • 0.45% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.90% fail on Lever
    • 0.81% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.81% fail on Pedal
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.090% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.090% fail on Leaks
    • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.090% fail on Valves
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.090% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.090% fail on Other components
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.090% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.63% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.81% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.36% fail on Anchor bracket (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.18% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.090% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.72% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.54% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.18% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (21 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (43 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.090% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.090% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts (84% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.090% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Body
      • 0.63% fail on Other body component
      • 0.18% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.18% fail on Panel
    • 0.63% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
        • 0.090% fail on Catch
      • 0.18% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
      • 0.090% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.090% fail on Catch
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.18% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.090% fail on Floor
    • 0.090% fail on Seats
      • 0.090% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.090% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 6.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.090% fail on Rams
    • 0.63% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.18% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.090% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.090% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (42% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Tread depth (67% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.090% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.090% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.090% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.090% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.090% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.090% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.090% fail on Undertray
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment
      • 0.090% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.090% fail on Airbags
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.090% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.090% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.090% fail on Speed limiter plate