MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.4% pass rate
from 1,863 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps (35% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.97% fail on All direction indicators (96% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Switch
        • 0.054% fail on Tell tales
    • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.9% fail on Battery (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.054% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.59% fail on Switch
      • 0.48% fail on Lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Rear reflectors (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.32% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 29% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 18% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear wheels (61% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Front wheels (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.054% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.054% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.054% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.9% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes (30% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Valves
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.054% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.91% fail on Leaks (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (75% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Fitment (25 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.48% fail on Cable
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Lever
      • 0.054% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.054% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.054% fail on Components
        • 0.054% fail on Valves
  • 19% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.9% fail on Front suspension joints (97% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (48% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 1.5% fail on Rear (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Spring mounting (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Fitment
    • 0.75% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.38% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.054% fail on Shackle
    • 0.32% fail on Air suspension (27 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (37 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Bellows
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
    • 0.11% fail on Panhard rods (21 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on General condition
    • 0.054% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.054% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 5.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.81% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.75% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.70% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Drivers view
  • 8.1% fail on Steering
    • 6.8% fail on Steering system
      • 5.3% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.38% fail on Operation
      • 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Pump
      • 0.11% fail on Drive system
      • 0.054% fail on Rams
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.16% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.16% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.054% fail on Steering column
    • 0.16% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (32% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Size/type
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition (46% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 0.97% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.054% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
    • 0.48% fail on Vehicle structure (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.054% fail on Passengers
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers
    • 0.054% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Access panel
  • 3.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (51% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
      • 0.054% fail on Hose
      • 0.054% fail on Pipe
    • 0.64% fail on Emissions (63% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (48% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (94% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Installation check
        • 0.054% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.59% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (64% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Towbars
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Attachment