MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2004

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2004
50.1% pass rate
from 2,822 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps (21% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.32% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Switch
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.035% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.1% fail on Horn
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (37% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (37% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.035% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Battery (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 26% fail on Brakes (25% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 18% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear wheels (72% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels (40% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.035% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.7% fail on Hub components (80% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (90% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.74% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Components (57% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes (57% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.28% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on ABS
    • 0.64% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.50% fail on Cable
      • 0.14% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Pivot
    • 0.53% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Pedal linkage
        • 0.035% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 19% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (87% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Front (56% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (49% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (73% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (34% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Spring mounting (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting (85% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.43% fail on Shackle bracket (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Anchor bracket (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.035% fail on Shackle
    • 0.14% fail on Air suspension (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (33 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.035% fail on Pipes
    • 0.071% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Location
    • 0.071% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.035% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.035% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.74% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Mirrors (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Drivers view
  • 8.0% fail on Steering
    • 5.7% fail on Steering system
      • 3.7% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Free play
        • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.071% fail on Other components
        • 0.035% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.035% fail on Steering component
      • 0.035% fail on Steering damper
    • 2.6% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Drive system (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Rams
      • 0.035% fail on Pump
    • 0.43% fail on Steering control
      • 0.21% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.21% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.21% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (72% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (77% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts (37% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (96% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Installation check (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.071% fail on Anchorage's (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.78% fail on System (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.071% fail on Pipe
    • 0.57% fail on Emissions (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (47% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition (57% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (62% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers front (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.071% fail on Emergency exits
    • 0.18% fail on Body security
    • 0.18% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Loading door (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Access panel
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis (94% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.071% fail on Passengers
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers
    • 0.035% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.035% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.035% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.14% fail on Towbars
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels (73% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Condition
    • 0.035% fail on Attachment
  • 0.071% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Driving controls
    • 0.035% fail on Speed limiter plate