Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.4% pass rate
from 3,782 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (17% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.5% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on All outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.053% fail on Front fog lamps (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Front fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Hazard warning (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Switch (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Rear reflectors (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.026% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.053% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.71% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (73% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Cable
        • 0.21% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Pivot (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Linkage
        • 0.026% fail on Rod
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.079% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.56% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
      • 0.026% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.026% fail on Valves
    • 0.053% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.026% fail on Other components
      • 0.026% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.026% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.026% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.026% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.026% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.026% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.37% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.079% fail on Leaf spring (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.026% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.079% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.053% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Operation (29 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.026% fail on Bellows
      • 0.026% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.026% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints
    • 0.82% fail on Body (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
    • 0.74% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Catch (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.079% fail on Catch (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Exhaust system (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Tank
      • 0.079% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.053% fail on Pipe
      • 0.026% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.079% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.079% fail on Carrier
    • 0.079% fail on Seats
      • 0.053% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.026% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.079% fail on Undertray
    • 0.053% fail on Load security
      • 0.053% fail on Loading door
    • 0.053% fail on Floor
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.93% fail on View to rear
      • 0.87% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.053% fail on Indirect vision devices (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.026% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.026% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.053% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.053% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.053% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.053% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Requirements
    • 0.026% fail on Airbags
      • 0.026% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Steering gear (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Operation
    • 0.58% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.026% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.58% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Steering coupling (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Steering column
    • 0.026% fail on Steering play
      • 0.026% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.053% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.053% fail on Doors
      • 0.026% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.026% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.026% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.026% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.026% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.026% fail on Attachment