MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2010

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.0% pass rate
from 3,437 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.058% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.029% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Cable (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.84% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.058% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.029% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.029% fail on Valves
    • 0.029% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.029% fail on Servos
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.029% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.087% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.058% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.58% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.087% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.029% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
    • 0.93% fail on Doors (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition
        • 0.029% fail on Hinge
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Pipe
      • 0.058% fail on Tank
    • 0.61% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Other body component
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
      • 0.029% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.087% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.058% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.029% fail on Bracket
    • 0.087% fail on Undertray
    • 0.058% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Load security
      • 0.058% fail on Loading door
    • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 11% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint dust cover (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.52% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Leaf springs (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.058% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.029% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on View to rear
      • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.029% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.61% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.029% fail on Window
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.087% fail on Requirements
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Airbags
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (72% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (97% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.81% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Engine oil leaks (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.029% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.029% fail on Undertray
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Steering gear (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Steering rack (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Operation
    • 0.76% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.058% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.029% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.058% fail on Rams
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.029% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.029% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.029% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.087% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.029% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.029% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.029% fail on Retractable steps