MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2017

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2017
65.7% pass rate
from 5,215 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (83% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (50% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device (180% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators (190% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type (190% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.019% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (56% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment (88% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Horn
      • 0.077% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.077% fail on Outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Outline marker lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Hazard warning (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.019% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.00% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (49% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (93% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (94% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (89% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (82% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Electronic stability control (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses (180% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.019% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (49% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.82% fail on Condition of glass (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Windscreen (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Window
    • 0.77% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.038% fail on Driver's view (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Springs (85% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.038% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.019% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.019% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition (77% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (97% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.096% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.077% fail on Other emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.019% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.77% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.058% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.077% fail on Noise suppression (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Undertray (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.019% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.35% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Flexible couplings (28 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Joints
        • 0.019% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.5% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Panel (11 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door (200% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.019% fail on Catch
      • 0.038% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat (9 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.058% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.058% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.038% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.019% fail on Carrier
    • 0.038% fail on Chassis
      • 0.038% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.038% fail on Load security
      • 0.019% fail on Loading door
      • 0.019% fail on Dropside
        • 0.019% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Bracket
  • 0.94% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.67% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.42% fail on Steering
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components (72% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.077% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.019% fail on Steering column
    • 0.019% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.019% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.096% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
    • 0.038% fail on Attachment