Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1989
43.4% pass rate
from 244 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 1989 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (74% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 7.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 2.9% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.41% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Battery
    • 3.3% fail on Hazard warning (160% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Switch
      • 0.41% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 30% fail on Suspension (56% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (150% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.41% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 28% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (74% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 14% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.7% fail on Components
        • 3.3% fail on Hoses
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Valves
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
        • 1.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Hub components
      • 0.41% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (77% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Cap
      • 0.41% fail on Pipe
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road (66% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 11% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.41% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Steering (79% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (100% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 11% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.41% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.41% fail on Steering control
      • 0.41% fail on Steering column
    • 0.41% fail on Steering operation
  • 7.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.1% fail on Body condition
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Speedometer (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Drivers
    • 0.82% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
      • 0.41% fail on Passengers front
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (73% better than other 1989 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 0.82% fail on Towbars
    • 0.82% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.41% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate