Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1992
48.6% pass rate
from 243 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 8.2% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 2.5% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.9% fail on Horn
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.82% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Switch (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.82% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (69% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 16% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 14% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (79% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 9.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.41% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt
          • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.82% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.82% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.41% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.82% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.41% fail on Lever
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.41% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.41% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.41% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.9% fail on Chassis
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.41% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.41% fail on Prop shaft
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.41% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.1% fail on Seats
      • 2.1% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.41% fail on Tank
      • 0.41% fail on System
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
    • 0.41% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.41% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.41% fail on Catch
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.82% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.82% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Steering (65% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering gear (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Steering rack (180% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.41% fail on Steering column
    • 0.41% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.41% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.41% fail on Steering play
      • 0.41% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.82% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates