MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Trafic » 1992

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1992
50.0% pass rate
from 218 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (95% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (95% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (95% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.8% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.46% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.46% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.46% fail on Position lamp
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 16% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 10% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt
          • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.92% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.92% fail on Lever
    • 0.92% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.92% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.46% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.46% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 2.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.92% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.6% fail on Chassis
      • 4.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.92% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.92% fail on Panel
      • 0.46% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.92% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.46% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.46% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.46% fail on Cabs
      • 0.46% fail on Steps
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 9.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.92% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.92% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.46% fail on View to rear
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.46% fail on Other components
        • 0.46% fail on Steering component
    • 1.4% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.46% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.46% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 0.92% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.92% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.46% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.46% fail on Speedometer