MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Trafic » 1994
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1994
55.9% pass rate
from 222 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.90% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 2.3% fail on Horn
      • 0.45% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.45% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.90% fail on Position lamp
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.90% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.45% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.45% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 1994 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
      • 9.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.45% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.90% fail on Servos (15 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
      • 0.45% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.90% fail on Air and vacuum systems (15 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Leaks
      • 0.45% fail on Servos
    • 0.90% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.90% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.45% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.45% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
    • 0.90% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Tank
      • 0.45% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.45% fail on Panel
    • 0.45% fail on Seats
      • 0.45% fail on Driver's seat
  • 11% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.45% fail on Steering play
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Spark ignition (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear
      • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 0.45% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.45% fail on Speedometer