Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1994
47.6% pass rate
from 191 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 3.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.52% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.1% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.0% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 25% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (88% worse than other 1994 vans)
          • 9.9% fail on Service brake performance (93% worse than other 1994 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.52% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.0% fail on Lever
    • 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.52% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.52% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.52% fail on Linkage
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.52% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.52% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.52% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.6% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 1.0% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Towbar
      • 0.52% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.52% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.52% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bar
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (200% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.52% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.9% fail on Steering
    • 8.4% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.52% fail on Steering play
      • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates