Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1994
42.0% pass rate
from 224 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 1994 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (95% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.6% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.8% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.45% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (59% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.45% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.1% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Rear (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Front
    • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.45% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Attachment
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.45% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.45% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (56% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 13% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.3% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Hoses
        • 1.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.8% fail on Valves
      • 0.89% fail on Leaks
    • 0.89% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.89% fail on Cap
      • 0.89% fail on System
      • 0.45% fail on Pipe
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (140% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.89% fail on Free play
        • 0.89% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.45% fail on Steering control
      • 0.45% fail on Steering column
    • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.5% fail on Chassis
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition
    • 3.1% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.89% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.45% fail on Towbars
    • 0.45% fail on Vehicle structure