MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Trafic » 1995
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1995
45.7% pass rate
from 258 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamps (95% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators (96% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type (96% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.78% fail on Horn
    • 0.78% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.78% fail on Switch
    • 0.78% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.39% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.39% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 23% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.39% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 7.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.78% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.78% fail on Cable
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.39% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.78% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.78% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.78% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.9% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.78% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.6% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe
    • 0.39% fail on Towbar
      • 0.39% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.39% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.39% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.39% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.39% fail on Hinge
    • 0.39% fail on Cabs
      • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
    • 0.39% fail on Steering wheel
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates