Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1996
48.0% pass rate
from 269 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.6% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.74% fail on Horn
      • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 1996 vans)
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (57% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (83% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.74% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.37% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.37% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.37% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.74% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.37% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.37% fail on Servos
    • 0.74% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Valves
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.7% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.74% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.74% fail on Anchor bracket (17 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Chassis
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
        • 0.37% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component
      • 0.74% fail on Panel
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.74% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.74% fail on Door condition
      • 0.37% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Tank
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.74% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Towbar
      • 0.37% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.37% fail on Load security
      • 0.37% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.37% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.37% fail on Cabs
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.37% fail on Locking devices
    • 3.3% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
      • 0.37% fail on Rams
    • 0.37% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.37% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Non catalyst emissions (12 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition