Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Renault Trafic MOT Results
Registered in 199749.7% pass rate
from 175 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 9.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 6.9% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.7% fail on Battery
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.7% fail on Front lamps
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 11% fail on Front wheels (130% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.7% fail on
Components
- 6.9% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 1.7% fail on Valves
-
9.7% fail on
Components
-
1.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 9.7% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Component mounting
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Rear (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.57% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.57% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.57% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.57% fail on Condition
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
17% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
15% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 14% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.57% fail on Ball joint
-
1.7% fail on
Power steering
- 0.57% fail on Operation
- 0.57% fail on Rams
- 0.57% fail on Other components
- 1.1% fail on Steering operation
-
15% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
17% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(93% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.1% fail on Body condition
-
3.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.4% fail on Chassis
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
- 1.1% fail on Passengers front
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 0.57% fail on Passengers
- 0.57% fail on Drivers
-
6.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet
- 0.57% fail on Windscreen
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.57% fail on Size/type
-
6.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Requirements
- 0.57% fail on Condition
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.57% fail on
Towbars
- 0.57% fail on Vehicle structure