MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Trafic » 1997
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 1997
53.0% pass rate
from 185 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.54% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.54% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.7% fail on Service brake performance (94% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (99% worse than other 1997 vans)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 9.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (90% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% worse than other 1997 vans)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.54% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.54% fail on Servos
    • 0.54% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.54% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.54% fail on Other braking system component
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.5% fail on Chassis
      • 6.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.54% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.54% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.54% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.54% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.54% fail on Catch
    • 0.54% fail on Floor
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.54% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.54% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.54% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.54% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.54% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.54% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.54% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.54% fail on Undertray
  • 9.7% fail on Steering (89% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas