Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.5% pass rate
from 1,696 tests in 2017
(9.2% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (12% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Front lamps (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.53% fail on All position lamps (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (30% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.47% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.12% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.6% fail on Horn
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp (45% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps (47% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.65% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.12% fail on Battery (92% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 29% fail on Suspension (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment
      • 0.059% fail on Condition
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 5.7% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Location
    • 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.6% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 0.77% fail on Rear
    • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.94% fail on Component mounting (81% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.059% fail on Condition
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Axles
      • 0.059% fail on Axle beam
  • 27% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels (47% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.65% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.059% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.0% fail on Components
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Valves
        • 2.1% fail on Hoses
      • 0.35% fail on Leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 5.4% fail on Hub components (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (82% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.77% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.12% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Cable (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage
      • 0.059% fail on Lever
    • 1.0% fail on ABS (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal (74% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.059% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.059% fail on Components
        • 0.059% fail on Valves
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.059% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 11% fail on Steering (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 10% fail on Steering system (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Track rod end (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Steering rack (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Free play
        • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.29% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.18% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
        • 0.059% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.059% fail on Steering component
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Drive system
      • 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.059% fail on Pump
    • 0.53% fail on Steering control (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering wheel (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering column
      • 0.059% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.059% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.29% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (94% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 3.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition (66% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis (61% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Engine mountings (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Doors (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers
      • 0.059% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.059% fail on Passengers
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
    • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on System
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
    • 0.59% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Emissions (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.059% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition