MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Trafic » 2010

Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
47.2% pass rate
from 6,315 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Macpherson strut (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (34% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring (36% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.032% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.74% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.36% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Axle
    • 0.13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.016% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.016% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (27% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (34% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Horn (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.016% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.38% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.016% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Brakes (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.048% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.74% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.9% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.048% fail on Linkage
        • 0.016% fail on Pivot
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.68% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on Flexible brake hoses (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.095% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.016% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.016% fail on Valves
    • 0.032% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Servos
    • 0.016% fail on Low pressure warning
      • 0.016% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
  • 13% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
        • 0.032% fail on Steering component (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.016% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.016% fail on Components
    • 0.44% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.063% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
      • 0.016% fail on Pump
    • 0.079% fail on Steering play
      • 0.079% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.048% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.032% fail on Steering column
  • 10% fail on Visibility (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (31% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on View to rear
      • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.49% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.49% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.016% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (18% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Transmission (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
      • 0.016% fail on Belts
    • 0.63% fail on Exhaust system (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
      • 0.095% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.095% fail on Door condition
      • 0.079% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.095% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Other body component
      • 0.048% fail on Panel
      • 0.016% fail on Body condition
    • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.016% fail on Bracket
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Tank
      • 0.032% fail on Pipe
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
      • 0.016% fail on System
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.079% fail on Chassis (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Chassis condition (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.079% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.079% fail on Carrier
    • 0.063% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.048% fail on Towbar
      • 0.032% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.016% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.016% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.016% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.048% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.016% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Fluid leaks (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.048% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Undertray (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Airbags
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.016% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.095% fail on Condition