Renault Trafic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
48.3% pass rate
from 6,880 tests in 2020
(23% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Trafic is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.029% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.029% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (24% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (24% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.044% fail on Switch
      • 0.029% fail on Front fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Front fog lamp switch (17 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (43% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.015% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.044% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.015% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.015% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 20% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.073% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.073% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.49% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (36% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.015% fail on Rod
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.015% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.57% fail on Flexible brake hoses (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.015% fail on Servos
      • 0.015% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.015% fail on Valves
    • 0.087% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.087% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.029% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.029% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 20% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Springs (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (34% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring (36% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Axle
    • 0.087% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.015% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Steering (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 13% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.029% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
        • 0.015% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.044% fail on Pipes and hoses (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.029% fail on Operation
    • 0.073% fail on Steering play
      • 0.073% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.058% fail on Steering column
    • 0.029% fail on Steering wheel
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.48% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.029% fail on Window
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.029% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.015% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
      • 0.015% fail on Body condition
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.029% fail on Catch
        • 0.015% fail on Hinge
      • 0.073% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.073% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on System
      • 0.015% fail on Tank
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.015% fail on Bracket
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.044% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.044% fail on Carrier
    • 0.029% fail on Load security
      • 0.015% fail on Loading door
      • 0.015% fail on Access panel
    • 0.029% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.015% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Towbar
      • 0.015% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.015% fail on Cabs
      • 0.015% fail on Steps
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (37% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.015% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.044% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.044% fail on Undertray
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Airbags
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.015% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.015% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.029% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.015% fail on Doors
      • 0.015% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
    • 0.015% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.015% fail on Retractable steps
  • 0.029% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.015% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.015% fail on Belt(s)/padding