Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.7% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Suspension
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 14% fail on Component mounting
      • 5.8% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 10% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Rear (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Front
    • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 7.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 7.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 5.8% fail on Macpherson strut (31 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Condition (31 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.4% fail on Location
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.8% fail on Battery
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 1.4% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 1.4% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
  • 28% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance
      • 14% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 12% fail on Components
        • 7.2% fail on Valves
        • 4.3% fail on Hoses
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes
      • 2.9% fail on Operation (13 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Service brake control components
      • 2.9% fail on Pedal
        • 2.9% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (28 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Bonnet (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 8.7% fail on Condition
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 10% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 10% fail on Seat belts
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 8.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 7.2% fail on Steering system
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
  • 1.4% fail on Towbars
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate