Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.5% pass rate
from 230 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Spring slippers
    • 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (66% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.2% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
        • 0.43% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.43% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.43% fail on Cable
    • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.87% fail on Size/type
    • 0.43% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.5% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Tank (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Cap (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Body security (22 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Body condition
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.87% fail on Steering
    • 0.43% fail on Steering control
      • 0.43% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.43% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.43% fail on Steering system
      • 0.43% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.43% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plate