Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.7% pass rate
from 252 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.40% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Reversing lamps (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Reversing lamps (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.79% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.79% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.40% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.0% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage
    • 2.8% fail on Springs
      • 2.8% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.8% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Washers
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.79% fail on View to rear
      • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 6.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pipe
      • 0.40% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 0.40% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.40% fail on Panel
      • 0.40% fail on Other body component
    • 0.79% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission
      • 0.40% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.40% fail on Cabs
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas