Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 199256.9% pass rate
from 116 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 10% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Tell tale
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.86% fail on Front lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.86% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Battery
- 0.86% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.86% fail on Horn
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Components
- 9.5% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Hoses
-
10% fail on
Components
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.4% fail on Front wheels
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.86% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.86% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.86% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.86% fail on Condition
-
0.86% fail on
Hub components
- 0.86% fail on Brake pads
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
6.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.4% fail on Spring mounting
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Front
-
0.86% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.86% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.86% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
6.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(110% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Tread depth (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Size/type
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.6% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 0.86% fail on Mirrors
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.6% fail on Emissions
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Steering rack
- 0.86% fail on Track rod end
-
0.86% fail on
Power steering
- 0.86% fail on Other components
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
-
4.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
- 0.86% fail on Requirements
- 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.6% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate