MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 1992
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 1992
56.9% pass rate
from 116 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.86% fail on Front lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.86% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.86% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.86% fail on Battery
    • 0.86% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.86% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.86% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.86% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Hub components
      • 0.86% fail on Brake pads
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.6% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
    • 0.86% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.86% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.86% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.86% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.86% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 10% fail on Tyres (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.86% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.86% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.86% fail on Other components
  • 4.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Requirements
      • 0.86% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate