Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.9% pass rate
from 349 tests in 2020
(16% better than other 1995 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (56% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.86% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Electrical equipment (83% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Horn
    • 0.57% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 0.57% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.57% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.57% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.57% fail on Transmission (82% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.57% fail on Joints
    • 0.57% fail on Body
      • 0.57% fail on Panel
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
  • 6.0% fail on Brakes (61% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.57% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.57% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.57% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.57% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.57% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.86% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (71% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.57% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.29% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.29% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.86% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plates