Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.0% pass rate
from 288 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 1995 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.4% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (97% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (97% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (0.72% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (7.6% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (74% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (24% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (51% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Side repeaters (41% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Position lamp (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (80% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Horn (80% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.35% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Visibility (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear (46% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Mirrors (46% worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 14% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (46% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (19% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (43% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (35% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (15% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (32% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (8.4% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Springs (53% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.35% fail on Leaf spring
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.35% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (31% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (28% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis (31% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (31% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (63% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (63% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Body (5.6% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Panel (54% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.69% fail on Transmission (75% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts (66% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Joints (66% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Seats (6.9% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Driver's seat (64% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar
      • 0.35% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.35% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.35% fail on Door condition
    • 0.35% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.35% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.35% fail on Cabs
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2.6% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (9.0% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.69% fail on Flexible brake hoses (26% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.35% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.35% fail on Additional braking device
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (44% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (8.3% worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (12% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts (18% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas (7.7% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Condition (0.72% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.35% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (3.0% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (70% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested (24% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.35% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.69% fail on Identification of the vehicle (21% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plates (18% better than other 1995 vans)
  • 0.69% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 0.35% fail on Steering
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Operation