Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 1996
57.8% pass rate
from 488 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 1996 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.61% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.41% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.41% fail on Headlamps (91% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.41% fail on Lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (34% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.9% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.41% fail on Subframe mounting (80% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.20% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.41% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.20% fail on Front
      • 0.20% fail on Rear
    • 0.20% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.20% fail on Location
    • 0.20% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Brakes (39% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.8% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes
        • 2.5% fail on Hoses
        • 1.0% fail on Valves
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (70% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels (78% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Hub components
      • 0.61% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on ABS
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.82% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Cap
  • 8.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition
    • 2.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis
    • 0.41% fail on Body security
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
    • 0.41% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
    • 0.20% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (80% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Steering control
      • 0.20% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.20% fail on Steering column
    • 0.41% fail on Steering system (91% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
  • 0.61% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.41% fail on Towbars
    • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure