MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 1997

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 1997
51.9% pass rate
from 295 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 5.8% fail on Chassis
      • 5.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Tank
      • 0.34% fail on System
    • 1.0% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
      • 0.34% fail on Panel
    • 0.68% fail on Cabs
      • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.34% fail on Towbar
      • 0.34% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.68% fail on Horn
      • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 1997 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.34% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 8.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on View to rear
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 1997 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt
          • 0.34% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.34% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.34% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.34% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.34% fail on Brake pads
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.34% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.34% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.68% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.68% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.68% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment
  • 0.34% fail on Steering
    • 0.34% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.34% fail on Track rod end